by David Lawrence
It’s ironic that liberals feel that women should engage in
actual combat, opening up the less physically strong and less environmentally
prepared sex to maiming or death. Liberals
cannot distinguish between males and females because they basically want sexes
to be treated the same in the name of the great principle-in-the-sky—ephemeral equality.
To progressives equality is the failure to make distinctions
and the inability to understand differences.
And yet, liberals are against torture even if it is for the
good of their own side. They don’t want
to hurt their enemies yet they don’t mind seeing their women maimed or murdered
in battle.
What is wrong with liberals?
They make pronouncements that seem fair minded and good yet the results
are horrendous, traitorous and anti-women.
They want to allow women to be killed in battle yet they won’t torture
their enemies and they won’t relieve women from combat no matter how their
backgrounds and physical assets are not conducive to battle.
A liberal friend of mine criticized my saying in the
Huffington Post that I felt we shouldn’t use women for combat. So he’s the gentle
philosopher here who wants to use women for targets. He is proud that he wants
women to have the opportunity to be killed.
He probably never read Falstaff’s saying about his troops, “…Food
for powder; They will fill a pit as well as better.” He was too busy
misunderstanding tradition and history, converting it into some utopian mistake,
to try to even make an attempt to protect women. How noble—turning women into “food
for powder.”
Liberals are women killers in the name of presumptuous equality.
I’m surprised liberal men can get dates.
Oh, that’s right, self-destructive women like them. They want to be them. They don’t recognize sexual differences.
Liberals remind me of communism. A philosophy filled with
good intentions that ended up in the murder of millions of people.
Liberals are not phonies.
They mean their desires. But they
fall short at every leap and are indeed stupid and shortsighted.
Civilization has depended on the kindness of women, their
love of family and their child rearing.
Pushing women into male roles to the delight of misogynists will slip
the rug out from under civilization. It will turn women more like men, their
violent brothers.
Women dying in battle is uglier than dying men. If you can't see the gentler sex bleeding to
death in a sand dune as worse than a man rotting than you have a certain amount
of dumb logic but no imagination.
If we want to dispose of a sex we should get rid of the
brilliant beasts—men. Why do women want
to take the worst traits from men? Men should imitate the kindness of women.
Women are different. There is no such thing as equal when
you are dealing with fundamental differences.
The polarity between men and women is what magnetically
holds society together. Leon Panetta, you should quit trying to make both sexes
the same. You should quit trying to
explode tradition and the differences that attract. The universe of men and women is held
together by their opposite attractions.
Not bloody women in Iraq.
Encouraging women to die in combat is ideological equality
but civilizational destruction.
It is the same as trying to make women and men not only
equal but the same. It is stupid and
fallacious. It is a product of the over-educated small mind, the academic fear
of warranted categorizations. The
politically correct need for Platonic forms of imagined correctness. The pat on
the back of self-righteousness.
