Schumer's endorsement of Hlllary is just
another excuse for Chuck to push his jowls into the doggie bowl of the
limelight. He actually means--"Vote
for Hillary but take a picture of me." If only he were a woman and good
looking I’m sure he’d be lining up to compete as a bathing suit model for Sport’s Illustrated.
He is as false and egotistical as
good-times-are-coming failed Obama. It is a joke that he says,
""Hillary's experience is unrivaled and her vision is unparalleled."
Most of Hillary’s experience was as an
Alinksyite, a radical, universal health care enthusiast and a wife who refused
to admit that Bill was cheating because it might endanger their political
careers.
Recently, she played a significant role in the
Benghazi screw up. Her comment, “What difference, does it make?” rivals Marie
Antoinette’s “Let them eat cake” for callous indifference.
Hillary’s only real credentials are having been
married to Bill who ended up a sexual degenerate who failed to accept bin
Laden’s transfer as a prisoner from the Sudan and backed Obama’s presidency
twice when he was far too intelligent to believe that Obama had the experience
or open-mindedness for the job.
Schumer is just a reflection walking into a
mirror and patting himself on the back. He applauds himself because—well, who
else would?
Hillary is Bill dressed in a skirt, an
attempted continuation of a liberal dynasty that has already failed and refuses
to respect American traditions. She is popular.
That’s usually a symbol of inadequacy where the voting public is
ignorant and self-interested.
Kennedy
said, “Ask not what your country can do
for you; ask what you can do for your country.” Obama said, “I’ll get
you food stamps.” Hillary implies, “I’m my husband.” And Schumer asks,
“Where are the photographers?”
“Where are the photographers?”
Vote gatherers accuse the Republicans of failing.
But it is the Democrats who are ruining the economy, the military, our ethics,
our traditions and our Emersonian self-reliance. The Democrat voters have
failed us, not the Republicans.
How?
They have failed us by voting for short term pleasure and hand-outs
rather than long term governance.
I am writing this in New York City, the land of
the liberal la-la’s. A few days ago I enjoyed the fruitless exercise of voting
for Joe Lhotta. Of course De Blassio won. He is the wrong man for the wrong job, a
liberal’s antagonistic delight.
When I was flying to Paris in the eighties De
Blassio was visiting Moscow. He
honeymooned in Cuba and visited Nicaragua.
He loves fascistic liberalism, a communist government that is strewn
with corpses from China to Cambodia.
And Hillary?
A not so bright woman who loves power.
And Bill? A bright man who loves
women.
-------------
David
Lawrence has a Ph.D. in literature. He
has published over 200 blogs, 600 poems, a memoir “The King of White-Collar
Boxing,” several books of poems, including “Lane Changes.” Both can be
purchased on Amazon.com. He was a
professional boxer and a CEO. Last year
he was listed in New York Magazine as the 41st reason to love New York.
No comments:
Post a Comment