At the conclusion of John McCain's speech last night, the song "Barracuda" by Heart, rang out over the convention floor. Of course, the song was in homage to Sarah Palin who was nicknamed "Sarah Barracuda" during her days as a high school basketball star.
As I was listening to the song, I recalled that the two sisters who comprise Heart, Ann and Nancy Wilson, are liberals and probably aren't too happy with their song being associated with the GOP. Sure enough, the Wilson sisters have sent the McCain-Palin campaign a cease and desist letter.
Obviously, it is their song and they can withhold permission from the McCain-Palin campaign if they wish. But clearly Palin has long had an affinity for this song. You would think Palin's association with the song would renew interest in their album Little Queen on which the song appears. It would boost record sales and introduce a new generation of fans to the song and to Heart. Ann and Nancy Wilson are entitled to their opinion but why go out of your way to diss someone who obviously likes your song? I'm sure there are a lot of Republican women (and men) who own their albums. They would be wise not to alienate people who helped make them rock n' roll icons.
Friday, September 5, 2008
Eva Mendes: Give Palin a Chance
I have no idea who actress Eva Mendes will be supporting this November. But I know that I like her attitude. Commenting on the media whirlwind surrounding Sarah Palin, Mendes said, "It's never easy when you're dealing with something like teen pregnancy. People need to look beyond that and give her the chance to have her fair say." Mendes made her comments during last night's premier of The Women in Los Angeles in which she co-stars with Annette Bening, Meg Ryan, Jada Pinkett-Smith and Candice Bergen.
Bergen, who has had her problems with Republican vice-presidential candidates in the past, was less generous. "I heard her speech and it's scary," said the former Murphy Brown star.
Well, it makes Eva Mendes that much more refreshing.
Bergen, who has had her problems with Republican vice-presidential candidates in the past, was less generous. "I heard her speech and it's scary," said the former Murphy Brown star.
Well, it makes Eva Mendes that much more refreshing.
Thursday, September 4, 2008
Sarkozy & Syria; Asaad Offers "Peace" With Israel
While French President Nicolas Sarkozy is an improvement over Jacques Chirac, I'm not comfortable with his engagement of Bashir Asaad in Syria. The Syrian President today put forth a peace overture to Israel. What exactly that peace overture was he wouldn't say. But it wouldn't involve dissociation from Hezbollah or the "resistance" against occupation (read terrorism). Asaad added nothing would be done until a new U.S. President and Israeli Prime Minister were in place.
Israel and Syria have been exchanging messages through Turkey. That's fine. But why should Sarkozy do anything to curry favor with the Syrians when they have not done anything to renounce support for terrorism. Sarkozy is essentially rewarding Asaad for his behavior and risks looking foolish in so doing.
Israel and Syria have been exchanging messages through Turkey. That's fine. But why should Sarkozy do anything to curry favor with the Syrians when they have not done anything to renounce support for terrorism. Sarkozy is essentially rewarding Asaad for his behavior and risks looking foolish in so doing.
A-Rod at Center of MLB's First Instant Replay
Nearly a week after it was introduced, instant replay made its debut last night and it was a bust.I was watching the Tampa Bay Rays host the New York Yankees on ESPN last night when in the 9th when Alex Rodriguez hit a long, long foul ball off Rays closer Troy Percival. I knew it was foul because the ball hit the catwalk in foul territory. But the umpires ruled it fair believing it had touched the foul pole. A-Rod's 31st home run, a two run shot, gave the Yankees an 8-3 lead. The Rays made a stink about it, particularly catcher Dioner Navarro, and crew chief Charlie Reliford decided to examine the videotape evidence.
Only two minutes and fifteen seconds later, the umps emerged and upheld the call. What's not clear is what videotape feed they saw - ESPN's, the Yankees telecast or the Rays. Or did they look at all three. Whatever feed they examined they botched the call. One of the arguments in favor of instant replay was that it was important for the umpires to get it right. Well, that certainly was not accomplished in last night's game which the Yankees won 8-4.
Ironically, back in May A-Rod had lost a homerun as a result of a botched call at Yankee Stadium. In a game against the Baltimore Orioles, A-Rod had hit a homerun over the right center field wall but the ball hit a staircase and bounced back on the field. A-Rod was awarded a double. So perhaps the umps wanted to atone for that error and last night gave them that opportunity. With the homerun, A-Rod hit his 549th career homerun passing Philadelphia Phillies legend Mike Schmidt for 12th place on the all time homerun list. Next on A-Rod's sights is "Mr. October" Reggie Jackson with 563.
It is clear there are chinks in the armor of instant replay.
Only two minutes and fifteen seconds later, the umps emerged and upheld the call. What's not clear is what videotape feed they saw - ESPN's, the Yankees telecast or the Rays. Or did they look at all three. Whatever feed they examined they botched the call. One of the arguments in favor of instant replay was that it was important for the umpires to get it right. Well, that certainly was not accomplished in last night's game which the Yankees won 8-4.
Ironically, back in May A-Rod had lost a homerun as a result of a botched call at Yankee Stadium. In a game against the Baltimore Orioles, A-Rod had hit a homerun over the right center field wall but the ball hit a staircase and bounced back on the field. A-Rod was awarded a double. So perhaps the umps wanted to atone for that error and last night gave them that opportunity. With the homerun, A-Rod hit his 549th career homerun passing Philadelphia Phillies legend Mike Schmidt for 12th place on the all time homerun list. Next on A-Rod's sights is "Mr. October" Reggie Jackson with 563.
It is clear there are chinks in the armor of instant replay.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Pakistani PM Gilani Survives Assassination Attempt
Pakistan's Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has survived an assassination attempt on his motorcade as it was driving from Rawalpindi to Islamabad. No one has claimed responsibility and the shooters have not been located. Although it would surprise no one if there was a Taliban/al Qaeda link.
The attempt comes three days before Pakistani lawmakers choose a new President. It is widely expected to be Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of Benazir Bhutto.
It is also worth noting that in recent weeks the Pakistanis have stepped up against Taliban/al Qaeda forces after first trying to negotiate with them shortly after taking office earlier this year. If Pakistan can't negotiate with these people then why should America?
Needless to say, Gilani is a target and so will Zardari should he become President.
The attempt comes three days before Pakistani lawmakers choose a new President. It is widely expected to be Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of Benazir Bhutto.
It is also worth noting that in recent weeks the Pakistanis have stepped up against Taliban/al Qaeda forces after first trying to negotiate with them shortly after taking office earlier this year. If Pakistan can't negotiate with these people then why should America?
Needless to say, Gilani is a target and so will Zardari should he become President.
Don LaFontaine, 1940-2008. R.I.P.
You wouldn't know his name but you certainly knew his voice especially if you went to the movies. Don LaFontaine, the voice over artist who often read trailers with "In a world gone mad", died on Monday due to complications from blood clots in his lungs. He had just turned 68.
Many years ago, while living in Ottawa, I tried my hand at voiceover work. A couple of friends of mine were producing a commercial for some exercise equipment and they asked me to do the voiceover. Believe me, it ain't easy. The commercial never saw the light of day.
LaFontaine was the master at his craft and is essentially the template for all who follow.
I did not know he was born in Duluth, Minnesota. That's about five hours south of my hometown of Thunder Bay, Ontario.
He was rarely seen by the public. One notable exception was this commercial he did for GEICO in 2006. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJMGS7IOwT8)
Many years ago, while living in Ottawa, I tried my hand at voiceover work. A couple of friends of mine were producing a commercial for some exercise equipment and they asked me to do the voiceover. Believe me, it ain't easy. The commercial never saw the light of day.
LaFontaine was the master at his craft and is essentially the template for all who follow.
I did not know he was born in Duluth, Minnesota. That's about five hours south of my hometown of Thunder Bay, Ontario.
He was rarely seen by the public. One notable exception was this commercial he did for GEICO in 2006. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJMGS7IOwT8)
Monday, September 1, 2008
Abbas Meets With Child Killer Kuntar
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas met with Samir Kuntar, the notorious child killing terrorist, during a trip to Lebanon. Kuntar was recently released by Israel in a prisoner exchange with Hezbollah. In 1979, Kuntar murdered an Israeli family including a 4 year old girl whose skull he crushed with a rifle butt. Israeli PM Ehud Olmert admonished Abbas for meeting with Kuntar which is certainly disconcerting enough. Then again such a meeting would not have taken place had Olmert not consented to his release in the first place.
Obama on Palin: "She Subscribes to John McCain's Agenda" You Don't Say!!!
I am sure I am not the first to comment on the Obama-Biden 60 Minutes interview but Obama's observation that Sarah Palin would subscribe to John McCain's agenda was truly a revelation. Was Obama expecting McCain to pick Dennis Kucinich? Of course, this also suggests he was caught off guard as the rest of us and still doesn't know how quite to handle this curveball McCain has thrown.
I was also amused that Joe Biden said, "Bush told me we weren't going to war." So, in other words, Bush is a liar. Was it a one on one conversation or were others present? Somehow I think President Bush remembers the conversation a wee bit differently.
I was also amused that Joe Biden said, "Bush told me we weren't going to war." So, in other words, Bush is a liar. Was it a one on one conversation or were others present? Somehow I think President Bush remembers the conversation a wee bit differently.
Friday, August 29, 2008
McCain Picks Palin
I like this pick.
Thank G-d he didn't pick Romney. That's a relief.
Fox News is confirming that John McCain has selected Sarah Palin, the Governor of Alaska, to be his running mate. She is to appear with McCain at a rally this afternoon in Dayton, Ohio.
A lot of people thought she wouldn't be picked because she was only elected Governor in 2006 and just gave birth to her fifth child in April. But she has a maverick streak and has been willing to stand up to corruption in her own party in Alaska. Unlike McCain, Palin actually was voted Miss Congeniality when she competed and won a beauty pageant in 1984. Speaking of 1984, Palin becomes the second woman to become a vice-presidential running mate. after Geraldine Ferraro who was tabbed by Walter Mondale.
Palin, who is 44, undoubtedly softens McCain's image and will appeal to female voters, especially those who previously supported Hillary Clinton. Democrats might criticize her inexperience but I would put up her experience against Obama's any day of the week. Especially her executive experience.
I would also add that she will be an effective debate opponent for Biden. Sure Romney could have gone toe to toe with Biden but Romney has so many negatives. Biden can't go after Palin the same way he would Romney or Pawlenty. I'm not saying he can't criticize her but he can't be seen to be bullying her. But if she can stand up to her own party, she can certainly stand up to Biden. Like Biden, she also has a son who will deploy to Iraq in the fall.
Yes, I am liking this pick more and more as each second passes. Yes, Pawlenty was my first choice but McCain hit a homerun on this one.
Thank G-d he didn't pick Romney. That's a relief.
Fox News is confirming that John McCain has selected Sarah Palin, the Governor of Alaska, to be his running mate. She is to appear with McCain at a rally this afternoon in Dayton, Ohio.
A lot of people thought she wouldn't be picked because she was only elected Governor in 2006 and just gave birth to her fifth child in April. But she has a maverick streak and has been willing to stand up to corruption in her own party in Alaska. Unlike McCain, Palin actually was voted Miss Congeniality when she competed and won a beauty pageant in 1984. Speaking of 1984, Palin becomes the second woman to become a vice-presidential running mate. after Geraldine Ferraro who was tabbed by Walter Mondale.
Palin, who is 44, undoubtedly softens McCain's image and will appeal to female voters, especially those who previously supported Hillary Clinton. Democrats might criticize her inexperience but I would put up her experience against Obama's any day of the week. Especially her executive experience.
I would also add that she will be an effective debate opponent for Biden. Sure Romney could have gone toe to toe with Biden but Romney has so many negatives. Biden can't go after Palin the same way he would Romney or Pawlenty. I'm not saying he can't criticize her but he can't be seen to be bullying her. But if she can stand up to her own party, she can certainly stand up to Biden. Like Biden, she also has a son who will deploy to Iraq in the fall.
Yes, I am liking this pick more and more as each second passes. Yes, Pawlenty was my first choice but McCain hit a homerun on this one.
Obama's Promises Are A Mile High & An Inch Deep
Some thoughts on Obama's speech at Mile High Stadium in Denver.
When Barack Obama starts channeling Dick Van Patten it is time to run away as fast as you can.
Obama did go into specifics more so than usual. Some of it was from the liberal laundry list such as ending tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. That was an oft repeated line from the Kerry campaign four years ago. Didn't work then. It won't work now.
Obama also wants "to provide every child with a world class education." He insists that he "won't settle for an America where some kids don't have that chance." If he won't stand for that, then he should stand for vouchers and giving parents the right to send their children to the school of their choice. Especially if he wants to create "an army of teachers." He'll pay them more in exchange for higher standards and more accountability. The teachers' unions will tell Obama, "You and what army?"
Regarding alternative energy, Obama promises to create "5 million jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced." How can he make a promise jobs won't be outsourced? Is he going to force businesses to get permission to relocate? More to the point, he still refuses to drill, drill, drill. Yes, drilling is a short term solution but you need a short term solution before you can implement a long term one.
The one promise, however, that might resonate with the electorate is a promise to cut taxes for 95% of working families. Instead of saying tax the rich, he's talking tax cut. If McCain can't convince the electorate, Obama will raise your taxes and the economy gets worse then he's in trouble. A proposed tax cut for 95% of working families could do for him what it did for Bill Clinton and the middle class tax cut in 1992.
Obama really took it to McCain. But what did Obama mean when he said, "You know, John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the gates of Hell, but he won't even follow him to the cave where he lives."?
Obama also said, "McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end the war." I would counter that Obama stands alone in his stubborn refusal to call the surge a success.
"I got news for you John McCain," Obama lectured, "We all put our country first."
Well then, Senator Obama. Why did you try to legislate defeat in Iraq? Is that putting our country first?
All in all, Obama was well spoken. But it remains to be seen if the American voter believes he actually said anything.
When Barack Obama starts channeling Dick Van Patten it is time to run away as fast as you can.
Obama did go into specifics more so than usual. Some of it was from the liberal laundry list such as ending tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. That was an oft repeated line from the Kerry campaign four years ago. Didn't work then. It won't work now.
Obama also wants "to provide every child with a world class education." He insists that he "won't settle for an America where some kids don't have that chance." If he won't stand for that, then he should stand for vouchers and giving parents the right to send their children to the school of their choice. Especially if he wants to create "an army of teachers." He'll pay them more in exchange for higher standards and more accountability. The teachers' unions will tell Obama, "You and what army?"
Regarding alternative energy, Obama promises to create "5 million jobs that pay well and can't be outsourced." How can he make a promise jobs won't be outsourced? Is he going to force businesses to get permission to relocate? More to the point, he still refuses to drill, drill, drill. Yes, drilling is a short term solution but you need a short term solution before you can implement a long term one.
The one promise, however, that might resonate with the electorate is a promise to cut taxes for 95% of working families. Instead of saying tax the rich, he's talking tax cut. If McCain can't convince the electorate, Obama will raise your taxes and the economy gets worse then he's in trouble. A proposed tax cut for 95% of working families could do for him what it did for Bill Clinton and the middle class tax cut in 1992.
Obama really took it to McCain. But what did Obama mean when he said, "You know, John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the gates of Hell, but he won't even follow him to the cave where he lives."?
Obama also said, "McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end the war." I would counter that Obama stands alone in his stubborn refusal to call the surge a success.
"I got news for you John McCain," Obama lectured, "We all put our country first."
Well then, Senator Obama. Why did you try to legislate defeat in Iraq? Is that putting our country first?
All in all, Obama was well spoken. But it remains to be seen if the American voter believes he actually said anything.
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Cuba To Put Punk Rocker On Trial For "Social Dangerousness"
I have just read the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation news website and found out that Cuba will be putting a punk rocker named Gorki Aguila on trial tomorrow for "social dangerousness". Aguila, who fronts the band Porno para Ricardo, has been an outspoken critic of the Castro regime - both Fidel and Raul. He was previously arrested for his political activities in 2005. (http://www.cbc.ca/arts/issues/mail/story/2008-08-18/cuban-rocker.html)
"Social dangerousness" is considered a breach of "standards of communist morality." Now there's an oxymoron.
My question is where are the Hollywood actors who decry infringement of artistic freedom?
I guess they are too busy wearing Che Guevara T-shirts.
"Social dangerousness" is considered a breach of "standards of communist morality." Now there's an oxymoron.
My question is where are the Hollywood actors who decry infringement of artistic freedom?
I guess they are too busy wearing Che Guevara T-shirts.
Mugabe Abandons Power Sharing
Days after being heckled by MDC parliamentarians at the opening of Zimbabwe's National Assembly, Robert Mugabe has abandoned any further power sharing with them and has announced he will form a government without the MDC. "The MDC don't want to come in apparently," said Mugabe.
Does this really come as a surprise to anyone?
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote a piece titled, "Has Mugabe Triumphed Again?" (http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/08/18/has-mugabe-triumphed-again/)
In the article, I argue the only power sharing agreement Mugabe would sign onto is one that would guarantee he is President for Life.
Of course, Mugabe cannot enter into any agreement that would diminish any of his power one iota because Mugabe does not wish to share power with anyone. He's a meglomaniac.
The best that can be done now is for the MDC to use whatever powers it might have in the National Assembly until such time that Mugabe sees fit to dissolve it. Such a move will delegitimize Mugabe amongst his fellow Africans. Whether other African governments isolate Mugabe however remains to be seen.
By the time Mugabe is out of power or is relegated to a place where he can do no more harm it will take a century for Zimbabwe to get back where it was prior to 1980.
Does this really come as a surprise to anyone?
A couple of weeks ago, I wrote a piece titled, "Has Mugabe Triumphed Again?" (http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/08/18/has-mugabe-triumphed-again/)
In the article, I argue the only power sharing agreement Mugabe would sign onto is one that would guarantee he is President for Life.
Of course, Mugabe cannot enter into any agreement that would diminish any of his power one iota because Mugabe does not wish to share power with anyone. He's a meglomaniac.
The best that can be done now is for the MDC to use whatever powers it might have in the National Assembly until such time that Mugabe sees fit to dissolve it. Such a move will delegitimize Mugabe amongst his fellow Africans. Whether other African governments isolate Mugabe however remains to be seen.
By the time Mugabe is out of power or is relegated to a place where he can do no more harm it will take a century for Zimbabwe to get back where it was prior to 1980.
Instant Replay Will Not Be An Instant Success
Today, MLB officially introduces instant replay.
This is because of a significant number of home run calls the umpires have botched this season.
Instant replay will only be used to determine on a) if the ball went fair or foul on a homerun b) if the ball went over the fence on a homerun or if it is simply base hit and c) where fan interference is involved.
The crew chief will consult broadcast replays and consult with an umpiring official in New York.
What isn't clear is how instant replay will be initiated. Is it something demanded by the manager? If so, can the crew chief refuse the manager's request for instant replay? Will managers have a per game limit as to how many times they could ask for instant replay?
Inevitably, this will be a matter of trial and error. Of course, this trial and error might very well extend into the playoffs and World Series.
While this might provide baseball long term improvement invariably as with any change someone will be unhappy with the outcome.
This is because of a significant number of home run calls the umpires have botched this season.
Instant replay will only be used to determine on a) if the ball went fair or foul on a homerun b) if the ball went over the fence on a homerun or if it is simply base hit and c) where fan interference is involved.
The crew chief will consult broadcast replays and consult with an umpiring official in New York.
What isn't clear is how instant replay will be initiated. Is it something demanded by the manager? If so, can the crew chief refuse the manager's request for instant replay? Will managers have a per game limit as to how many times they could ask for instant replay?
Inevitably, this will be a matter of trial and error. Of course, this trial and error might very well extend into the playoffs and World Series.
While this might provide baseball long term improvement invariably as with any change someone will be unhappy with the outcome.
Some Slightly More Detailed Thoughts on Joe Biden's Speech
Here are three observations about Joe Biden's speech.
1. I found Beau Biden's introduction quite impressive. It's obvious there's a great deal of love and affection in this family. The tragedy they've endured has brought them closer together. I wish Beau well when he is deployed to Iraq in October.
2. Biden's father told him, "Champ, when you get knocked down, get up. Get up." Hey, I've used that credo as a source of inspiraton. But then Biden later said, "I've never seen a time when Washington has watched so many people get knocked down without doing anything to help them get back up." I thought the whole point of getting up when you've been knocked down was a sign of your perserverance. Getting back up is something you do on your own not by relying on the government. The other thing to consider is that sometimes it is government that knocks people down and gets in the way.
3. Is Biden serious when he questions McCain's judgement on foreign policy? Does Biden really think talking to Ahmadinejad is the best way to advance our security? Does Biden really think Obama's judgement was sound when he called for restraint on both sides when Russia invaded Georgian territory? Does Biden really think Obama's judgement was sound when he equated the United States entering Iraq with Russia entering Georgia? I guess Obama sees no difference between Saddam and Saakashvili.
Biden said, "Now, after six long years, the Bush Administration and the Iraqi government are on the verge of setting a date to bring our troops home. John McCain was wrong. Barack Obama was right."
Um, the reason the Bush Administration and the Iraqi government are the verge of setting a date to bring our troops home is because of a little something called the surge. Something neither Obama nor Biden supported. Democrats said the War in Iraq was lost. John McCain was right. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are wrong.
If Biden wants to challenge McCain on his foreign policy cred then by all means, please bring it on.
1. I found Beau Biden's introduction quite impressive. It's obvious there's a great deal of love and affection in this family. The tragedy they've endured has brought them closer together. I wish Beau well when he is deployed to Iraq in October.
2. Biden's father told him, "Champ, when you get knocked down, get up. Get up." Hey, I've used that credo as a source of inspiraton. But then Biden later said, "I've never seen a time when Washington has watched so many people get knocked down without doing anything to help them get back up." I thought the whole point of getting up when you've been knocked down was a sign of your perserverance. Getting back up is something you do on your own not by relying on the government. The other thing to consider is that sometimes it is government that knocks people down and gets in the way.
3. Is Biden serious when he questions McCain's judgement on foreign policy? Does Biden really think talking to Ahmadinejad is the best way to advance our security? Does Biden really think Obama's judgement was sound when he called for restraint on both sides when Russia invaded Georgian territory? Does Biden really think Obama's judgement was sound when he equated the United States entering Iraq with Russia entering Georgia? I guess Obama sees no difference between Saddam and Saakashvili.
Biden said, "Now, after six long years, the Bush Administration and the Iraqi government are on the verge of setting a date to bring our troops home. John McCain was wrong. Barack Obama was right."
Um, the reason the Bush Administration and the Iraqi government are the verge of setting a date to bring our troops home is because of a little something called the surge. Something neither Obama nor Biden supported. Democrats said the War in Iraq was lost. John McCain was right. Barack Obama and Joe Biden are wrong.
If Biden wants to challenge McCain on his foreign policy cred then by all means, please bring it on.
A Quick Thought on Bill Clinton's Speech
Is it just me or was Bill Clinton's nose getting longer when he said Obama was ready to be President of the United States?
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Canadians Could Go To The Polls Very, Very Soon
There is a great deal of talk that there will be an election in Canada very, very soon.
Much of the talk is from Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Earlier this month, he referred to Parliament as being "dysfunctional" and placed the blame on Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion. The Conservatives, who have a minority government, have been subjected to repeated votes of confidence over the past few months. Invariably, the Liberals either don't attend the vote or vote with the government.
The Conservatives want a vote as do the NDP and Bloc Quebecois. Why don't the Liberals want one? They are deeply in debt. They are also trailing the Conservatives in the polls. An Ipsos Reid/Global/National Post poll released August 19th had the Tories at 36% and the Liberals at 30%.
Harper is up in the Arctic promoting Canadian sovereignty. He's also asked Governor General Michelle Jean not to attend the Paralympics in Beijing next month. She was due to have left on September 5th. You see, in Canada, the Prime Minister asks the Governor General to dissolve Parliament for the purposes of calling an election.
There is some controversy around this though. Last year, the Tory government, following trends in Ontario and British Columbia, passed legislation to have elections on fixed dates as they do in the United States. The next federal election was due to have taken place on October 19, 2009. However, Harper states that since his government is a minority one the law does not apply. After all, the government can fall on a confidence vote thus forcing elections.
Back in February, the government came close to falling over whether Canada would continue its mission in Afghanistan. (http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/10/could-canada-%e2%80%99s-conservative-government-fall-over-afghanistan/) Fortunately, the French came to the rescue. (Yes, I actually did write that last sentence.)
Harper could pull the trigger as soon as September 2nd, the day after Labor Day. Harper and the Tories came to power after elections in January 2006.
Naturally, Harper's aim is to have the voters give him a majority government so that Parliament won't be "dysfunctional." But he could also be rewarded with another minority government. Which would for him be as bad as losing to the Liberals outright. There might be great reward for Harper. But great reward does come with great risk.
Much of the talk is from Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Earlier this month, he referred to Parliament as being "dysfunctional" and placed the blame on Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion. The Conservatives, who have a minority government, have been subjected to repeated votes of confidence over the past few months. Invariably, the Liberals either don't attend the vote or vote with the government.
The Conservatives want a vote as do the NDP and Bloc Quebecois. Why don't the Liberals want one? They are deeply in debt. They are also trailing the Conservatives in the polls. An Ipsos Reid/Global/National Post poll released August 19th had the Tories at 36% and the Liberals at 30%.
Harper is up in the Arctic promoting Canadian sovereignty. He's also asked Governor General Michelle Jean not to attend the Paralympics in Beijing next month. She was due to have left on September 5th. You see, in Canada, the Prime Minister asks the Governor General to dissolve Parliament for the purposes of calling an election.
There is some controversy around this though. Last year, the Tory government, following trends in Ontario and British Columbia, passed legislation to have elections on fixed dates as they do in the United States. The next federal election was due to have taken place on October 19, 2009. However, Harper states that since his government is a minority one the law does not apply. After all, the government can fall on a confidence vote thus forcing elections.
Back in February, the government came close to falling over whether Canada would continue its mission in Afghanistan. (http://www.intellectualconservative.com/2008/02/10/could-canada-%e2%80%99s-conservative-government-fall-over-afghanistan/) Fortunately, the French came to the rescue. (Yes, I actually did write that last sentence.)
Harper could pull the trigger as soon as September 2nd, the day after Labor Day. Harper and the Tories came to power after elections in January 2006.
Naturally, Harper's aim is to have the voters give him a majority government so that Parliament won't be "dysfunctional." But he could also be rewarded with another minority government. Which would for him be as bad as losing to the Liberals outright. There might be great reward for Harper. But great reward does come with great risk.
A Quick Thought on Hillary's Speech
I don't really have much to add to what's already been said about Hillary's speech last night at the DNC. She talked more about herself than Obama. Hell, she talked more about Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs-Jones than about Obama. She didn't give Obama a ringing endorsement but she delivered her endorsement with gusto. And with that, after Bill's speech tonight, I don't think you'll see either Clinton campaigning with Obama between now and November 4th.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Report: Zardari Suffered From Mental Illness
There's an article from The Financial Times which states that Asif Ali Zardari, the man most likely to become Pakistan's next President, has been diagnosed with various mental illnesses including dementia.
This story is based in documents filed with the High Court in London when Zardari was fighting corruption charges against him by the Pakistani government. (http://www.financialtimes/com/cms/S/0/7c186dSL-72fo-11dd-983b-0000779fd18c.html)
It is worth noting that his disordered were likely caused during the time he was incarcerated in Pakistani jails on corruption charges for a better part of a decade. It is widely believed that Zardari was subjected to torture while in prison.
The psychiatrist who diagnosed Zardari, Dr. Steven Reich wrote:
He had difficulty focusing, concentrating and paying attention, is persistently sad, chronically anxious and apprehensive. He stated that he has had suicidal thoughts, but has not made any suicidal gestures.
Zardari has not commented on the article. However, Zardari's close ally Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Pakistan's High Commissioner to London (which is essentially an Ambassador) did not deny the story and said Zardari's disposition was understandable given what he endured in prison.
My guess is that Zardari will still be elected Pakistan's next President on September 6th. If this, however, does become an issue for his supporters in the PPP then Zardari would withdraw rather than have his own deputies vote against him.
Zardari did have some good news. The Swiss have dropped money laundering charges against him. That should lift his spirits.
Of course, the question is if Zardari could not assist himself in court proceedings against him how can he be reasonably expected to govern Pakistan?
This story is based in documents filed with the High Court in London when Zardari was fighting corruption charges against him by the Pakistani government. (http://www.financialtimes/com/cms/S/0/7c186dSL-72fo-11dd-983b-0000779fd18c.html)
It is worth noting that his disordered were likely caused during the time he was incarcerated in Pakistani jails on corruption charges for a better part of a decade. It is widely believed that Zardari was subjected to torture while in prison.
The psychiatrist who diagnosed Zardari, Dr. Steven Reich wrote:
He had difficulty focusing, concentrating and paying attention, is persistently sad, chronically anxious and apprehensive. He stated that he has had suicidal thoughts, but has not made any suicidal gestures.
Zardari has not commented on the article. However, Zardari's close ally Wajid Shamsul Hasan, Pakistan's High Commissioner to London (which is essentially an Ambassador) did not deny the story and said Zardari's disposition was understandable given what he endured in prison.
My guess is that Zardari will still be elected Pakistan's next President on September 6th. If this, however, does become an issue for his supporters in the PPP then Zardari would withdraw rather than have his own deputies vote against him.
Zardari did have some good news. The Swiss have dropped money laundering charges against him. That should lift his spirits.
Of course, the question is if Zardari could not assist himself in court proceedings against him how can he be reasonably expected to govern Pakistan?
North Korea Up To Its Old Tricks
The North Koreans have announced that they have suspended disabling their nuclear facility at Yongbyon and might even restore its operational capacity because the United States has not removed it from the State Department's list of nations that sponsor terror.
As part of the six country agreement reached last October, North Korea would be removed from the list provided there was an acceptable means to verify their claims. Thus far North Korea has not let anyone verify they have actually decommissioned Yongbyon. So no removal from the list.
Remember what Reagan said. Trust, but verify.
As part of the six country agreement reached last October, North Korea would be removed from the list provided there was an acceptable means to verify their claims. Thus far North Korea has not let anyone verify they have actually decommissioned Yongbyon. So no removal from the list.
Remember what Reagan said. Trust, but verify.
Barack Obama Has A Funny Name, According To His Wife
A couple of weeks ago, Barack Obama said that John McCain and Republicans would make America scared of him because of, amongst other things, his funny name. Yet last night it was Michelle Obama who described her husband as having "a funny name" during her address to the Democratic National Convention.
Is Michelle Obama trying to scare America?
Whatever she was trying to do she did hit all the right notes about the American Dream and how she loves this country. She hit those notes but was she singing from the heart? In other words, did she really mean what she said last night? I have no doubt she loves her husband and her children. I also have no doubt she terribly misses her father who was stricken down by MS. But does she really love this country? What I do know is that when she said she was proud of her country for the first time she meant every word. What I do know is that when she said America was "downright mean" she meant it.
But if Michelle Obama does in fact love her country we will see it with her deeds not her words. On that front, the jury is still out.
Is Michelle Obama trying to scare America?
Whatever she was trying to do she did hit all the right notes about the American Dream and how she loves this country. She hit those notes but was she singing from the heart? In other words, did she really mean what she said last night? I have no doubt she loves her husband and her children. I also have no doubt she terribly misses her father who was stricken down by MS. But does she really love this country? What I do know is that when she said she was proud of her country for the first time she meant every word. What I do know is that when she said America was "downright mean" she meant it.
But if Michelle Obama does in fact love her country we will see it with her deeds not her words. On that front, the jury is still out.
An honest assessment of the Dem. convention
Oops. This is Ted Kennedy addressing the 1980 Democrat Convention, not the 2008. So much for the Democrats being about change.
Some thoughts from the fiscal liberal of the family, so he's arguably more objective than the rest of us -
Interesting first night at the DNC--I though it was generally a bust. The highlight was the Ted Kennedy speech--his niece gave a nice intro and the sailing video wasn't bad. Kennedy's speech wasn't especially articulate, but it was short and he's at the age where a certain "curtness" can be attributed to "Uncle Ted." However it was not the "no dry eyes in the house" speech that the media had said it would be.
The biggest surprise was the Michelle Obama speech--which I thought was a real bust. It should have been a short bio of herself and Obama--with lots of things for the delegates to cheer for--and some humor (ie. personalizing the Obamas). Instead they gave the speech to some college student to write and he piled on a whole raft of "target audiences" onto what should have been an uplifting chat. There were endless references to Obama supporting the workers and Obama struggling--and on and on. There was virtually nothing for the audience to cheer about (until the end--and the Hillary reference). The college student-esque references to "the threat that links us together" was way too abstract and put the audience to sleep. Worse, the whole thing was so wordy that Michelle lost her place from time to time and was forced to make these artificial "pauses for emphasis."
In short, instead of "humanizing her," the speech came across as totally staged. Which was sad, because she seems like a terrific person. She should have been left alone to be herself--and instead was hijacked by the same guys who decided to make John Kerry's speech all about the Vietnam war (and his opposition to it). Anyway "humanizing" Michelle failed.
In short, instead of "humanizing her," the speech came across as totally staged. Which was sad, because she seems like a terrific person. She should have been left alone to be herself--and instead was hijacked by the same guys who decided to make John Kerry's speech all about the Vietnam war (and his opposition to it). Anyway "humanizing" Michelle failed.
I disagree with Carville and the Democrat hounds who thought the first day should have been about attacking McCain however. Obama is about "new politics"--and this night was supposed to be about that. I think Obama and Company simply failed to deliver.
Dem. convention: Our old guy is better than your old guy
Some thoughts from a friend who watched the opening night of the Democrat convention:
So, I turn on the TV this morning and think to myself, “why is the old bald guy McCain making a speech the day Barack Obama is going to announce his Veep choice?” Then I realize the crinkly balding guy making the speech is Joe Biden. My initial thought is our old cranky guy is better than your guy. Seriously, is this the politics of change? The guy is the same generation as Johnny Mac (did he even serve in military?) and can’t represent any new ideas. Didn’t he first get elected when Nixon was President? I earlier thought that Hillary wouldn’t be the VP choice because having her on the ticket would represent the same old same old. Now I’m wondering, if you’re going to go with the attack dog professional politician, why wouldn’t Hillary get the nod? Seriously, I don’t get this. I thought he’d go with Bayh or Vilseck, or someone that would truly represent the politics of change. This should be a democratic election. But I wonder if folks in
Monday, August 25, 2008
Madonna Compares McCain to Hitler
My mother asked me if I had heard about this when we spoke over the phone last night. I hadn't. Frankly, my life doesn't revolve around delving into Madonna's political insight if such a thing exists. After all, she and Michael Moore were basically the only two people in America who thought Wesley Clark would make a good President.
A few nights ago, Madonna launched her latest world tour in Cardiff, Wales and at one point in the show there were images of carnage, global warming accompanied by images of Adolf Hitler, Robert Mugabe and John McCain. These were contrasted with images of John Lennon, Gandhi and Barack Obama.
Again, not that I place a great deal of value on her view of the world. But there are a significant number of people who equate Bush with Hitler and it seems now equate McCain with Hitler. A couple of weeks ago I wrote about Randy Newman's McCain-Hitler comparison. (http://intellectualconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/randy-newman-has-no-reason-to-live.html)
Unlike Madonna, I actually care about Newman's music.
But that consderation aside, it tells me that many people are either profoundly ignorant about what Adolf Hitler actually did or are simply quick to equate people with whom they disagree or don't like with a mass murderer as casually as one would close a door. Whatever the case, it is clear that Madonna, Randy Newman and a cast of thousands have actually given the Holocaust almost no thought at all much less taken the time to learn what actually happened. The fact that the Holocaust cannot be taught in many British schools due to pressure from Muslim parents does not bode well for either history or for our future.
A few nights ago, Madonna launched her latest world tour in Cardiff, Wales and at one point in the show there were images of carnage, global warming accompanied by images of Adolf Hitler, Robert Mugabe and John McCain. These were contrasted with images of John Lennon, Gandhi and Barack Obama.
Again, not that I place a great deal of value on her view of the world. But there are a significant number of people who equate Bush with Hitler and it seems now equate McCain with Hitler. A couple of weeks ago I wrote about Randy Newman's McCain-Hitler comparison. (http://intellectualconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/randy-newman-has-no-reason-to-live.html)
Unlike Madonna, I actually care about Newman's music.
But that consderation aside, it tells me that many people are either profoundly ignorant about what Adolf Hitler actually did or are simply quick to equate people with whom they disagree or don't like with a mass murderer as casually as one would close a door. Whatever the case, it is clear that Madonna, Randy Newman and a cast of thousands have actually given the Holocaust almost no thought at all much less taken the time to learn what actually happened. The fact that the Holocaust cannot be taught in many British schools due to pressure from Muslim parents does not bode well for either history or for our future.
Good News in Zimbabwe
This morning I had read that several members of the MDC who were elected to parliament in March had been arrested after being summoned by Robert Mugabe.
But this afternoon I have learned that those members were released and that an MDC member, Lovemore Moyo, had been elected Speaker of Zimbabwe's National Assembly.
This is a hopeful sign. I have no illusions the parliament will rid the country of hunger, disease and violence. But if a MDC controlled parliament can curb the excesses of Mugabe then perhaps there is just a little bit of hope for democracy in Zimbabwe.
But this afternoon I have learned that those members were released and that an MDC member, Lovemore Moyo, had been elected Speaker of Zimbabwe's National Assembly.
This is a hopeful sign. I have no illusions the parliament will rid the country of hunger, disease and violence. But if a MDC controlled parliament can curb the excesses of Mugabe then perhaps there is just a little bit of hope for democracy in Zimbabwe.
Sharif Resigns From Pakistani Government
After giving Asif Ali Zardari a Wednesday deadline to reinstate Chaudhry and the other judges sacked by Musharraf, Nawaz Sharif pushed the deadline up to Monday. Not surprisingly, Zardari didn't budge. So Sharif has resigned from the Pakistani government and will sit with the opposition. Back in June, Sharif had withdrawn his Ministers although he did continue to support Zardari on an issue by issue basis.
It appears also that Sharif will back someone from the Pakistan Muslim League-N to run against Zardari for the Pakistani Presidency on September 6th. However, Zardari and the Pakistan People's Party appear to have sufficient support from smaller parties necessary for him to be elected President.
I do think the judges should have been reinstated long ago. Musharraf's heavy handedness began with the judges and ended with detaining opposition figures. Yes, Zardari fears that old corruption charges would be reinstated against him if he were to restore the judges. But one would think that Chaudhry would have some gratitude at being reinstated by Zardari and might be inclined not to reinstate the charges as a gesture of good will.
All of this maneuvering is part of politics. However, given the violence that has been ongoing in Pakistan at the hands of the Taliban and the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear nation people are not inclined to have a lot of confidence in the future of Pakistani democracy with today's developments.
It appears also that Sharif will back someone from the Pakistan Muslim League-N to run against Zardari for the Pakistani Presidency on September 6th. However, Zardari and the Pakistan People's Party appear to have sufficient support from smaller parties necessary for him to be elected President.
I do think the judges should have been reinstated long ago. Musharraf's heavy handedness began with the judges and ended with detaining opposition figures. Yes, Zardari fears that old corruption charges would be reinstated against him if he were to restore the judges. But one would think that Chaudhry would have some gratitude at being reinstated by Zardari and might be inclined not to reinstate the charges as a gesture of good will.
All of this maneuvering is part of politics. However, given the violence that has been ongoing in Pakistan at the hands of the Taliban and the fact that Pakistan is a nuclear nation people are not inclined to have a lot of confidence in the future of Pakistani democracy with today's developments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
