Sunday, January 27, 2013

Liberals want Combat for Women

by David Lawrence

It’s ironic that liberals feel that women should engage in actual combat, opening up the less physically strong and less environmentally prepared sex to maiming or death.  Liberals cannot distinguish between males and females because they basically want sexes to be treated the same in the name of the great principle-in-the-sky—ephemeral equality.

To progressives equality is the failure to make distinctions and the inability to understand differences.
And yet, liberals are against torture even if it is for the good of their own side.  They don’t want to hurt their enemies yet they don’t mind seeing their women maimed or murdered in battle. 
What is wrong with liberals?  They make pronouncements that seem fair minded and good yet the results are horrendous, traitorous and anti-women.  They want to allow women to be killed in battle yet they won’t torture their enemies and they won’t relieve women from combat no matter how their backgrounds and physical assets are not conducive to battle.
A liberal friend of mine criticized my saying in the Huffington Post that I felt we shouldn’t use women for combat. So he’s the gentle philosopher here who wants to use women for targets. He is proud that he wants women to have the opportunity to be killed.
He probably never read Falstaff’s saying about his troops, “…Food for powder; They will fill a pit as well as better.” He was too busy misunderstanding tradition and history, converting it into some utopian mistake, to try to even make an attempt to protect women. How noble—turning women into “food for powder.”
Liberals are women killers in the name of presumptuous equality. I’m surprised liberal men can get dates.  Oh, that’s right, self-destructive women like them.  They want to be them.  They don’t recognize sexual differences.
Liberals remind me of communism. A philosophy filled with good intentions that ended up in the murder of millions of people.
Liberals are not phonies.  They mean their desires.  But they fall short at every leap and are indeed stupid and shortsighted.
Civilization has depended on the kindness of women, their love of family and their child rearing.  Pushing women into male roles to the delight of misogynists will slip the rug out from under civilization. It will turn women more like men, their violent brothers.
Women dying in battle is uglier than dying men.  If you can't see the gentler sex bleeding to death in a sand dune as worse than a man rotting than you have a certain amount of dumb logic but no imagination.
If we want to dispose of a sex we should get rid of the brilliant beasts—men.  Why do women want to take the worst traits from men?   Men should imitate the kindness of women.
Women are different. There is no such thing as equal when you are dealing with fundamental differences.
The polarity between men and women is what magnetically holds society together. Leon Panetta, you should quit trying to make both sexes the same.  You should quit trying to explode tradition and the differences that attract.  The universe of men and women is held together by their opposite attractions.  Not bloody women in Iraq.
Encouraging women to die in combat is ideological equality but civilizational destruction.
It is the same as trying to make women and men not only equal but the same.  It is stupid and fallacious. It is a product of the over-educated small mind, the academic fear of warranted categorizations.  The politically correct need for Platonic forms of imagined correctness. The pat on the back of self-righteousness.

No comments: