Outfielder Marlon Byrd has signed a three-year contract with the Chicago Cubs worth $15 million.
Byrd is coming off the best season of his eight year big league career. He hit .283 with 20 home runs and 89 RBI with the Texas Rangers in 2009. Prior to '09, Byrd had never hit more than 10 home runs or driven in 70 runs in a season.
One must legitimately wonder if Byrd's numbers in '09 are an aberration. On the other hand it is worth noting that Rudy Jaramillo is the Cubs new hitting coach. Jaramillo helped improve Byrd's offense while he was the hitting coach with the Rangers. So there should be some continuity there. But even if Byrd's numbers do slip in 2010 he will be an improvement over Kosuke Fukudome in center field. Fukudome is likely to play right field in 2010 with the departure of Milton Bradley.
Byrd began his MLB career with the Philadelphia Phillies in 2002. He was traded to the Washington Nationals during the 2005 season and signed with the Rangers as a free agent prior to the 2007 season.
I think Byrd is a good addition to the Cubs. But I suspect they have only begun signing free agents. They are in dire need of a closer. My guess is that they will try to sign Jose Valverde to fill that role.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
A Liberal Sticks Up For Limbaugh
Three cheers for Rochelle Riley of The Detroit Free Press.
Riley scolds left-wing bloggers in a piece titled, "Stop wishing Rush Limbaugh dead."
Riley makes it clear she does not agree with any of Rush's views. But she also makes it clear that those who wish him grievous harm are only hurting America:
Yes, he has crossed the line before. He's made us mad as hell. But as he recovers in a hospital in Honolulu, where he was vacationing when he was stricken, America gives Rush Limbaugh the right to the same freedom of speech that I have, even if his speech makes my heart hurt.
Shame on anyone who wants the match between Limbaugh and the many who oppose him to be called on a technical knock-out. I'd rather he get back in the ring and eventually suffer an intellectual one.
To have America means having the Rush Limbaughs of the world. Stop wishing death on democracy.
With that I would like to wish Rochelle Riley a Happy New Year.
Riley scolds left-wing bloggers in a piece titled, "Stop wishing Rush Limbaugh dead."
Riley makes it clear she does not agree with any of Rush's views. But she also makes it clear that those who wish him grievous harm are only hurting America:
Yes, he has crossed the line before. He's made us mad as hell. But as he recovers in a hospital in Honolulu, where he was vacationing when he was stricken, America gives Rush Limbaugh the right to the same freedom of speech that I have, even if his speech makes my heart hurt.
Shame on anyone who wants the match between Limbaugh and the many who oppose him to be called on a technical knock-out. I'd rather he get back in the ring and eventually suffer an intellectual one.
To have America means having the Rush Limbaughs of the world. Stop wishing death on democracy.
With that I would like to wish Rochelle Riley a Happy New Year.
A Suggested New Year's Resolution for President Obama
I don't know if President Obama has made any New Year's Resolutions for 2010.
I would like to make the humble suggestion that President Obama resolve not to blame any problems he has in the new year on things that occurred during the "previous administration" or the "previous eight years."
Then again if President Obama were to make such a resolution he would break it within a matter of days if not hours.
I would like to make the humble suggestion that President Obama resolve not to blame any problems he has in the new year on things that occurred during the "previous administration" or the "previous eight years."
Then again if President Obama were to make such a resolution he would break it within a matter of days if not hours.
Get Well Soon Rush
As you all probably know by now, Rush Limbaugh was hospitalized yesterday after experiencing chest pains while on vacation in Hawaii.
But by all accounts he is going to make a full recovery.
Predictably there are those in the blogosphere who wish him grievous harm.
But that tells you a lot about those people, doesn't it?
Rush will get some much needed rest and then return to the airwaves to do what he does best - drive liberals into a tizzy.
Success is the best revenge.
But by all accounts he is going to make a full recovery.
Predictably there are those in the blogosphere who wish him grievous harm.
But that tells you a lot about those people, doesn't it?
Rush will get some much needed rest and then return to the airwaves to do what he does best - drive liberals into a tizzy.
Success is the best revenge.
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Why The Death Penalty Needs To Be Restored In MA
I did not know that this happened until today.
On Saturday afternoon, a man robbed a Tedeschi convenience store in Jamaica Plain on the corner of Centre & Eliot Streets. The store clerk co-operated with the robber's demand. The robber shot and killed the clerk anyway. The robber then fled by getaway car.
Surendra Dangoi, a 31-year-old Nepalese immigrant, died from a shotgun wound to the chest. Dangoi had only been on the job for a few days and had just filled that shift at the last minute. He leaves behind a wife and child in Nepal. But for the grace of G-d.
I have not been inside that store recently but it is in my neighborhood. A part of the neighborhood I'm in at least a couple of times a week. A part of the neighborhood where I feel comfortable. Of course, I'm aware that horrible things can happen anywhere at anytime. But when something this heinous occurs the person responsible should not sit in a prison cell where he can watch TV all day. If this case doesn't cry for the restoration of the death penalty in Massachusetts I don't know what does.
On Saturday afternoon, a man robbed a Tedeschi convenience store in Jamaica Plain on the corner of Centre & Eliot Streets. The store clerk co-operated with the robber's demand. The robber shot and killed the clerk anyway. The robber then fled by getaway car.
Surendra Dangoi, a 31-year-old Nepalese immigrant, died from a shotgun wound to the chest. Dangoi had only been on the job for a few days and had just filled that shift at the last minute. He leaves behind a wife and child in Nepal. But for the grace of G-d.
I have not been inside that store recently but it is in my neighborhood. A part of the neighborhood I'm in at least a couple of times a week. A part of the neighborhood where I feel comfortable. Of course, I'm aware that horrible things can happen anywhere at anytime. But when something this heinous occurs the person responsible should not sit in a prison cell where he can watch TV all day. If this case doesn't cry for the restoration of the death penalty in Massachusetts I don't know what does.
"Dr. Death" Steve Williams, 1960-2009. R.I.P.
Former professional wrestler "Dr. Death" Steve Williams has died. He was 49.
Unlike many of his contemporaries, Williams death was not as a result of steroid use. Williams was diagnosed with throat cancer five years ago but made a recovery sufficient enough to return to the ring. He formally retired earlier this year.
Williams only had a limited association with the WWE but was one of the most successful American wrestlers in Japan. I remember him best with Bill Watts' Universal Wrestling Federation (originally known as the Mid-South Wrestling) in the mid-1980s. Williams was one of those big men you never thought anyone could knock down. But the bell tolls for all of us sooner or later.
Unlike many of his contemporaries, Williams death was not as a result of steroid use. Williams was diagnosed with throat cancer five years ago but made a recovery sufficient enough to return to the ring. He formally retired earlier this year.
Williams only had a limited association with the WWE but was one of the most successful American wrestlers in Japan. I remember him best with Bill Watts' Universal Wrestling Federation (originally known as the Mid-South Wrestling) in the mid-1980s. Williams was one of those big men you never thought anyone could knock down. But the bell tolls for all of us sooner or later.
Can Bay Keep The Critics at Bay?
Well, Jeff Pearlman of SI.com does not like the Mets signing of Jason Bay.
Pearlman likens the signing of Bay to the Mets signing of Cincinnati Reds slugger George Foster prior to the 1982 season. The George Foster the Mets got was not the George Foster who hit 52 home runs and drove in 149 runs en route to the NL MVP in 1977.
Yet I don't think Pearlman is being fair to Bay. Although Foster did finish 3rd in the NL MVP balloting in 1981 his productivity had declined every year since his MVP season. If anything Bay hasn't yet reached his peak.
But Pearlman isn't optimistic. "If Bay has an absolutely outstanding 2010, he might hit 25 homers. He might," writes Pearlman. He bases this argument on the decline of David Wright's productivity in 2009. The Mets third baseman went from hitting 33 home runs and 124 RBI in 2008 to hitting only 10 home runs and 72 RBI in 2009. Pearlman attributes Wright's subpar '09 season to the dimensions of Citi Field.
While one can make a legitimate case that Citi Field is more pitcher friendly than Shea Stadium, Pearlman misses the obvious. As I pointed out yesterday, the presence of Bay and a healthy Carlos Beltran will enable Wright to see better pitches. With the absence of Beltran and Carlos Delgado for most of the '09 season pitchers in the NL pitched around Wright. As for Citi Field's dimensions what is preventing the Mets from moving in the fences?
I do agree with Pearlman that the Mets need more than Bay. Specfically, they need starting pitching. If the Mets were able to sign the likes of Joel Pineiro and Jarrod Washburn then 2010 could be a different story. A starting rotation of Johann Santana, Pineiro, Washburn, a healthy John Maine and a more consistent Mike Pelfrey could make the Mets a viable contender in the NL East.
But if the Mets don't add starting pitchers how is that Bay's fault? If Bay hits more than 25 home runs in 2010 it will be interesting to see what Pearlman will have to scribble.
Pearlman likens the signing of Bay to the Mets signing of Cincinnati Reds slugger George Foster prior to the 1982 season. The George Foster the Mets got was not the George Foster who hit 52 home runs and drove in 149 runs en route to the NL MVP in 1977.
Yet I don't think Pearlman is being fair to Bay. Although Foster did finish 3rd in the NL MVP balloting in 1981 his productivity had declined every year since his MVP season. If anything Bay hasn't yet reached his peak.
But Pearlman isn't optimistic. "If Bay has an absolutely outstanding 2010, he might hit 25 homers. He might," writes Pearlman. He bases this argument on the decline of David Wright's productivity in 2009. The Mets third baseman went from hitting 33 home runs and 124 RBI in 2008 to hitting only 10 home runs and 72 RBI in 2009. Pearlman attributes Wright's subpar '09 season to the dimensions of Citi Field.
While one can make a legitimate case that Citi Field is more pitcher friendly than Shea Stadium, Pearlman misses the obvious. As I pointed out yesterday, the presence of Bay and a healthy Carlos Beltran will enable Wright to see better pitches. With the absence of Beltran and Carlos Delgado for most of the '09 season pitchers in the NL pitched around Wright. As for Citi Field's dimensions what is preventing the Mets from moving in the fences?
I do agree with Pearlman that the Mets need more than Bay. Specfically, they need starting pitching. If the Mets were able to sign the likes of Joel Pineiro and Jarrod Washburn then 2010 could be a different story. A starting rotation of Johann Santana, Pineiro, Washburn, a healthy John Maine and a more consistent Mike Pelfrey could make the Mets a viable contender in the NL East.
But if the Mets don't add starting pitchers how is that Bay's fault? If Bay hits more than 25 home runs in 2010 it will be interesting to see what Pearlman will have to scribble.
Is Closing Gitmo "A Fundamental National Security Interest"?
Get a load of this White House Press Background Briefing done yesterday afternoon in Honolulu.
To start with the person conducting the background briefing is indentified only as a "Senior Administration Official." It seems rather peculiar that the White House would not identify the person giving a press briefing.
But then maybe it's because the Obama Administration doesn't want anyone to shoot the messenger. When a reporter asked about the transfer of six Gitmo detainees back to Yemen last week the "Senior Administration Official" stated:
You know, we've been obviously working this through very aggressively. We're making decisions based on a range of intelligence that we have and we're obviously dealing with a situation that we've inherited as it relates to our ability to hold certain individuals. But we're confident that any transfers that we're making are being made not only consistent with our national security interests but also consistent with what we consider to be a fundamental national security interest in closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.
I think that some of us were struck by the fact when al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula itself was formed it was the conglomeration of two separate al Qaeda affiliates -- when it was formed, one of the recruiting and motivational tools that it used in its initial announcement to generate sympathy for its cause as well as recruits was the facility at Guantanamo Bay.
So we continue to feel that this is in our national security interest to close. We feel that the way we're closing it is advancing our national security interest goals, and that will continue to be the case.
Where to begin?
The Senior Administration Official claims "we're obviously dealing with a situation we've inherited." What a cop out! Well, it's a situation they've complicated by making the decision to close Gitmo the first day on the job. Maybe they should have sat back and come to a fuller understanding of what they "inherited" before making such a rash and foolish decision.
What national security interest does closing Gitmo serve exactly? This decision opened the door for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to have a civilian trial. This decision opened the door for Umar Farouk Abdul Mutullab to invoke his right to remain silent. Or does the Obama Administration believe its bears no responsibility for its decisions?
Well, the Obama Administration argues that Guantanamo is a recruitment tool for al Qaeda. Let's say that it is a recruitment tool for al Qaeda. But then what about our enlarged presence in Afghanistan? Isn't that a recruitment tool for al Qaeda? If the Obama Administration takes its argument to its logical conclusion then immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan would be "a fundamental national security interest." The same could also be said for our support for Israel, the rights of women and religious freedom. Does the Obama Administration wish to dispense with these policies as well?
Gitmo will still be open in 2010 but by making the decision to shutter it without any thought the Obama Administration has tied their own hands behind their back and compromised our ability to address those very fundamental national security interests.
To start with the person conducting the background briefing is indentified only as a "Senior Administration Official." It seems rather peculiar that the White House would not identify the person giving a press briefing.
But then maybe it's because the Obama Administration doesn't want anyone to shoot the messenger. When a reporter asked about the transfer of six Gitmo detainees back to Yemen last week the "Senior Administration Official" stated:
You know, we've been obviously working this through very aggressively. We're making decisions based on a range of intelligence that we have and we're obviously dealing with a situation that we've inherited as it relates to our ability to hold certain individuals. But we're confident that any transfers that we're making are being made not only consistent with our national security interests but also consistent with what we consider to be a fundamental national security interest in closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.
I think that some of us were struck by the fact when al Qaeda on the Arabian Peninsula itself was formed it was the conglomeration of two separate al Qaeda affiliates -- when it was formed, one of the recruiting and motivational tools that it used in its initial announcement to generate sympathy for its cause as well as recruits was the facility at Guantanamo Bay.
So we continue to feel that this is in our national security interest to close. We feel that the way we're closing it is advancing our national security interest goals, and that will continue to be the case.
Where to begin?
The Senior Administration Official claims "we're obviously dealing with a situation we've inherited." What a cop out! Well, it's a situation they've complicated by making the decision to close Gitmo the first day on the job. Maybe they should have sat back and come to a fuller understanding of what they "inherited" before making such a rash and foolish decision.
What national security interest does closing Gitmo serve exactly? This decision opened the door for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to have a civilian trial. This decision opened the door for Umar Farouk Abdul Mutullab to invoke his right to remain silent. Or does the Obama Administration believe its bears no responsibility for its decisions?
Well, the Obama Administration argues that Guantanamo is a recruitment tool for al Qaeda. Let's say that it is a recruitment tool for al Qaeda. But then what about our enlarged presence in Afghanistan? Isn't that a recruitment tool for al Qaeda? If the Obama Administration takes its argument to its logical conclusion then immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan would be "a fundamental national security interest." The same could also be said for our support for Israel, the rights of women and religious freedom. Does the Obama Administration wish to dispense with these policies as well?
Gitmo will still be open in 2010 but by making the decision to shutter it without any thought the Obama Administration has tied their own hands behind their back and compromised our ability to address those very fundamental national security interests.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Jason Bay Signs With Mets
Outfielder Jason Bay has signed a four-year, $66 million contract with the New York Mets. There is an option year available for 2014.
The 31-year-old had been with the Boston Red Sox since being acquired on July 31, 2008 from the Pittsburgh Pirates in the three team deal which sent Manny Ramirez to the Los Angeles Dodgers. In 2009, Bay hit .267 with 36 home runs and 119 RBI. Bay led the Red Sox in HR, RBI and walks.
To remain in Boston, Bay wanted a five year deal worth $75 million. The most the Sox would offer him was $60 million over four years. When you consider that the Sox were willing to offer John Lackey, a number three starter, $82.5 million over five years one can only conclude the Sox did not make a serious effort to re-sign him.
Actually, Bay was in the Mets organization before. Originally drafted by the Montreal Expos in 2000, Bay was traded with pitcher Jimmy Serrano to the Mets for Lou Collier prior to the 2002 season. But Bay's stay with the Mets was shortlived. After stints with the St. Lucie Mets in the Florida State League and the Binghamton Mets in the Eastern League he was traded to the San Diego Padres on July 31, 2002.
Bay would make his MLB debut with the Padres the following season before being traded again to the Pirates. It was in Pittsburgh he would blossom becoming NL Rookie of the Year in 2004 - the first Pirate to be so honored. When you consider all the rookies who played with the Pirates - Bill Mazeroski, Roberto Clemente, Willie Stargell, Al Oliver - it is quite an accomplishment.
As for the future, the presence of Bay in the Mets lineup should be of help to David Wright. With injuries to Carlos Beltran and Carlos Delgado, Wright did not see a lot of good pitches. He hit a career low 10 home runs and did not drive in 100 runs for the first time since his rookie season in 2004. Bay, Wright and a healthy Beltran could be formidable. Bay's easy going attitude is also a nice antidote to Delgado's sometimes sour disposition.
But even with the addition of Bay the Mets still need starting pitching after Johan Santana. While there is every reason that Bay will make a positive contribution at Citi Field the jury is still very much out on the 2010 New York Mets.
The 31-year-old had been with the Boston Red Sox since being acquired on July 31, 2008 from the Pittsburgh Pirates in the three team deal which sent Manny Ramirez to the Los Angeles Dodgers. In 2009, Bay hit .267 with 36 home runs and 119 RBI. Bay led the Red Sox in HR, RBI and walks.
To remain in Boston, Bay wanted a five year deal worth $75 million. The most the Sox would offer him was $60 million over four years. When you consider that the Sox were willing to offer John Lackey, a number three starter, $82.5 million over five years one can only conclude the Sox did not make a serious effort to re-sign him.
Actually, Bay was in the Mets organization before. Originally drafted by the Montreal Expos in 2000, Bay was traded with pitcher Jimmy Serrano to the Mets for Lou Collier prior to the 2002 season. But Bay's stay with the Mets was shortlived. After stints with the St. Lucie Mets in the Florida State League and the Binghamton Mets in the Eastern League he was traded to the San Diego Padres on July 31, 2002.
Bay would make his MLB debut with the Padres the following season before being traded again to the Pirates. It was in Pittsburgh he would blossom becoming NL Rookie of the Year in 2004 - the first Pirate to be so honored. When you consider all the rookies who played with the Pirates - Bill Mazeroski, Roberto Clemente, Willie Stargell, Al Oliver - it is quite an accomplishment.
As for the future, the presence of Bay in the Mets lineup should be of help to David Wright. With injuries to Carlos Beltran and Carlos Delgado, Wright did not see a lot of good pitches. He hit a career low 10 home runs and did not drive in 100 runs for the first time since his rookie season in 2004. Bay, Wright and a healthy Beltran could be formidable. Bay's easy going attitude is also a nice antidote to Delgado's sometimes sour disposition.
But even with the addition of Bay the Mets still need starting pitching after Johan Santana. While there is every reason that Bay will make a positive contribution at Citi Field the jury is still very much out on the 2010 New York Mets.
DeRosa Hearts San Francisco
Super utility man Mark DeRosa has signed a two-year contract with the San Francisco Giants worth $12 million.
DeRosa split the 2009 season between the Cleveland Indians and the St. Louis Cardinals hitting .250 with 23 home runs and 78 RBI. Although DeRosa made his MLB debut with the Atlanta Braves in 1998 he really didn't blossom until 2006 as a member of the Texas Rangers. DeRosa, who turns 35 in February, signed as a free agent with the Chicago Cubs the following year and enjoyed two productive seasons before being traded nearly a year ago to the Tribe. He was dealt to the Cardinals last July.
While DeRosa can play a variety of positions it is expected that he will play third base for the Giants in 2010. That means Pablo Sandoval will play first base. That also means the Giants won't be pursuing Adam LaRoche. While DeRosa has driven in at least 70 runs in each of the last four seasons I think the Giants need one more big bat. Matt Holliday would be nice but I have a feeling that won't happen. Jermaine Dye could be a nice fit.
Still, the Giants are standing a little taller today.
DeRosa split the 2009 season between the Cleveland Indians and the St. Louis Cardinals hitting .250 with 23 home runs and 78 RBI. Although DeRosa made his MLB debut with the Atlanta Braves in 1998 he really didn't blossom until 2006 as a member of the Texas Rangers. DeRosa, who turns 35 in February, signed as a free agent with the Chicago Cubs the following year and enjoyed two productive seasons before being traded nearly a year ago to the Tribe. He was dealt to the Cardinals last July.
While DeRosa can play a variety of positions it is expected that he will play third base for the Giants in 2010. That means Pablo Sandoval will play first base. That also means the Giants won't be pursuing Adam LaRoche. While DeRosa has driven in at least 70 runs in each of the last four seasons I think the Giants need one more big bat. Matt Holliday would be nice but I have a feeling that won't happen. Jermaine Dye could be a nice fit.
Still, the Giants are standing a little taller today.
ABC Reporter to Wed White House Budget Director
This morning ABC news reporter Bianna Golodryga announced her engagement Peter Orszag, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget on Good Morning America.
So the network's financial correspondent is marrying the man responsible for planning the federal budget.
I knew the liberal media was in bed with the Obama Administration but this is ridiculous.
Nevertheless, congratulations to the couple on their impending nuptials.
So the network's financial correspondent is marrying the man responsible for planning the federal budget.
I knew the liberal media was in bed with the Obama Administration but this is ridiculous.
Nevertheless, congratulations to the couple on their impending nuptials.
Imagine Being on Board Northwest Airlines Flight 253
This piece written by Steven Gray from Time Magazine really annoys the hell out of me.
He is writing about the passengers who were on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit two days after the same flight was nearly blown up in mid-air by al Qaeda recruit Umar Faruk Abdulmutallab.
Towards the end of the flight, a Nigerian man had to go to the bathroom, spent more than an hour in the lavatory and refused to come out. As it turns out this man wasn't a terrorist but rather had a very bad case of food poisoning.
Yet Gray has the audacity to ask if the passengers of both overreacting and engaging in racial profiling. Gray writes, "But is racial or ethnic profiling ever justified - and, if so, when, and why?"
Steven Gray should take a moment and put himself on that flight. I suspect most of the passengers had no way of knowing if this man was Nigerian. But the fact he would behave in this manner scarcely 48 hours after someone attempted to blow up the same flight would have raised alarm bells amongst passengers regardless of his race and national origin.
If someone tries to blow up a plane and then someone engages in unusual behavior on the very same plane 48 hours later is it unreasonable to consider that the individual in question might be up to no good? You are 30,000 feet in the air and have nowhere to go. What else could have done under the circumstances?
Since it was a case of food poisoning one must wonder why a) this passenger didn't simply say he was ill and b) didn't accept medical attention (assuming there was a doctor or nurse on board who could have treated him until the plane landed)? I could imagine that if there was a language barrier that would have added to the general chaos but I don't know if that was germane to this situation. I wasn't there.
Neither was Steven Gray. The last thing the passengers of Sunday's Northwest Airlines Flight 253 need is for some grandstanding reporter to wag his finger at them and raise the spectre of racial profiling.
He is writing about the passengers who were on Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit two days after the same flight was nearly blown up in mid-air by al Qaeda recruit Umar Faruk Abdulmutallab.
Towards the end of the flight, a Nigerian man had to go to the bathroom, spent more than an hour in the lavatory and refused to come out. As it turns out this man wasn't a terrorist but rather had a very bad case of food poisoning.
Yet Gray has the audacity to ask if the passengers of both overreacting and engaging in racial profiling. Gray writes, "But is racial or ethnic profiling ever justified - and, if so, when, and why?"
Steven Gray should take a moment and put himself on that flight. I suspect most of the passengers had no way of knowing if this man was Nigerian. But the fact he would behave in this manner scarcely 48 hours after someone attempted to blow up the same flight would have raised alarm bells amongst passengers regardless of his race and national origin.
If someone tries to blow up a plane and then someone engages in unusual behavior on the very same plane 48 hours later is it unreasonable to consider that the individual in question might be up to no good? You are 30,000 feet in the air and have nowhere to go. What else could have done under the circumstances?
Since it was a case of food poisoning one must wonder why a) this passenger didn't simply say he was ill and b) didn't accept medical attention (assuming there was a doctor or nurse on board who could have treated him until the plane landed)? I could imagine that if there was a language barrier that would have added to the general chaos but I don't know if that was germane to this situation. I wasn't there.
Neither was Steven Gray. The last thing the passengers of Sunday's Northwest Airlines Flight 253 need is for some grandstanding reporter to wag his finger at them and raise the spectre of racial profiling.
Monday, December 28, 2009
Thoughts on President Obama's Statement on Iran
This afternoon, President Obama took a pause from his vacation to address the attempted terrorist attack aboard Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas Day. He also briefly spoke about the political violence in Iran. I will focus my comments on his remarks concerning Iran.
While President Obama condemned the "violent and unjust suppression of innocent Iranian citizens" he made other statements that were less than confidence inspiring:
Along with all free nations the United States stands with those who seek their universal rights. We call upon the Iranian government to abide by the international obligations that it has to respect the rights of its own people. We call for the immediate release of all who have been unjustly detained within Iran. We will continue to bear witness to the extraordinary events that are taking place there. And I'm confident that history will be on the side of those who seek justice.
Calling on Iran to abide by international obligations and call upon it to release those unjustly detained are all well and good. While he's at it why not call upon the Iranians to release those American hikers who Iran is putting on trial for espionage?
But the Obama Administration needs to do more than "continue to bear witness to the extraordinary events that are taking place there." All that means is that we continue to bear witness to the Iranian regime killing more of its own. That's not good enough.
President Obama needs to announce that engagement with Iran is over. The time has now come for regime change. Meaningful sanctions would be a first step in that direction. We'll see what comes of that in the new year.
While President Obama condemned the "violent and unjust suppression of innocent Iranian citizens" he made other statements that were less than confidence inspiring:
Along with all free nations the United States stands with those who seek their universal rights. We call upon the Iranian government to abide by the international obligations that it has to respect the rights of its own people. We call for the immediate release of all who have been unjustly detained within Iran. We will continue to bear witness to the extraordinary events that are taking place there. And I'm confident that history will be on the side of those who seek justice.
Calling on Iran to abide by international obligations and call upon it to release those unjustly detained are all well and good. While he's at it why not call upon the Iranians to release those American hikers who Iran is putting on trial for espionage?
But the Obama Administration needs to do more than "continue to bear witness to the extraordinary events that are taking place there." All that means is that we continue to bear witness to the Iranian regime killing more of its own. That's not good enough.
President Obama needs to announce that engagement with Iran is over. The time has now come for regime change. Meaningful sanctions would be a first step in that direction. We'll see what comes of that in the new year.
Obama Administration Approach to Israel & Iran
Today, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs issued a press release concerning Israeli construction in East Jerusalem that began with the sentence, "The United States opposes new Israeli construction in East Jerusalem."
Simple. Direct. To the point. Incredibly misguided.
Yesterday, National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer issued a press release concerning violence in in Iran that began with the sentence, "We strongly condemn the violent and unjust suppression of civilians in Iran seeking to exercise their universal rights."
Mickey Spillane would never have written such a mealy mouthed sentence. If I had written a sentence like that in high school any of my teachers would have asked, "Who are you condemning?"
With the White House placing more pressure on Israel than on Iran is it any wonder Khamenei, the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad do not take the Obama Administration seriously?
Simple. Direct. To the point. Incredibly misguided.
Yesterday, National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer issued a press release concerning violence in in Iran that began with the sentence, "We strongly condemn the violent and unjust suppression of civilians in Iran seeking to exercise their universal rights."
Mickey Spillane would never have written such a mealy mouthed sentence. If I had written a sentence like that in high school any of my teachers would have asked, "Who are you condemning?"
With the White House placing more pressure on Israel than on Iran is it any wonder Khamenei, the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad do not take the Obama Administration seriously?
In Defense of Juan Pierre
I just read an article by Sky Andrecheck on SI.com concerning the worst contracts in MLB.
For the most part I concur with Andrecheck's list. Vernon Wells, Barry Zito and Alfonso Soriano have proven to be a monetary albatross on the fortunes of the Toronto Blue Jays, San Francisco Giants and the Chicago Cubs, respectively.
But I am puzzled by the inclusion of newly acquired Chicago White Sox outfielder Juan Pierre. The veteran outfielder is owed $18.5 million over the next two years although a majority of that will be paid by the Los Angeles Dodgers. Andrecheck writes:
Everyone loves a .300-hitting speedster who is one of the biggest basestealing threats in the game. At least that's what the Dodgers were thinking when they signed Pierre. Unfortunately, that .300-hitting speedster can be a pretty bad player if he hits with absolutely no power and rarely takes a walk. Especially when he plays left field, an offensive position. According to OPS+, Pierre has been a league-average hitter or better just twice in his career (last year and in 2004). Considering that defensive metrics have him at just an average defensive left fielder, Pierre certainly isn't worth the money he's owed. Add in the fact that Pierre was unhappy being a fourth outfielder, and Dodgers GM Ned Colletti had to move him.
It is true that Pierre is no power hitter. But that's hardly breaking news. I don't think the Dodgers were expecting him to hit more than 3 home runs a season. Pierre has hit 13 home runs in 10 big league seasons. It is also true that Pierre rarely draws a walk. But it is also true that Pierre rarely strikes out. While Pierre has only walked 340 times in his big league career he has also only struck out 337 times against MLB pitching. Between 2001 and 2007, Pierre was the toughest batter to strike out in the NL in five of those seasons. Put simply Pierre puts the ball in play.
Of course, Pierre is unhappy being a fourth outfielder. Curiously, Andrecheck makes no mention of the arrival of Manny Ramirez who severely curtailed Pierre's playing time. Pierre played in all 162 games between 2003 and 2007 and would have continued to do so if not Ramirez' arrival in July 2008. Given the injuries speedy outfielders are prone to in their knees, hamstrings, quads and Achilles' tendons it's amazing that Pierre is so durable. Aside from a stint on the DL in 2008, Pierre has been remarkably reliable for the teams with which he's played.
O.K., Pierre only walks 35-40 times a year. So what? He has collected 200 or more hits four times. In 2004 and 2006, it was good enough to lead the NL. Between 2001 and 2007, Pierre either led in the NL in stolen bases or came in second. Even with his limited playing time in 2008 and 2009, Pierre still finished 5th in the NL in steals. Yes, he does get caught stealing a lot but he's no rally killer. It's the price one sometimes pays for aggressive baserunning.
As for 2010, put Pierre down for 162 games, 185 hits, 90 runs scored, 50 stolen bases and a .300 average. If he can put up those numbers look for the White Sox to make the post-season in 2010. Of course, Pierre won't be the only player responsible for that but he would set the table big enough to fit several cases of champagne.
I think Andrecheck is one of those baseball writers who places way too much emphasis on OBP, OPS and OPS +. Those stats aren't without merit but they don't tell the whole story. Far from it.
For the most part I concur with Andrecheck's list. Vernon Wells, Barry Zito and Alfonso Soriano have proven to be a monetary albatross on the fortunes of the Toronto Blue Jays, San Francisco Giants and the Chicago Cubs, respectively.
But I am puzzled by the inclusion of newly acquired Chicago White Sox outfielder Juan Pierre. The veteran outfielder is owed $18.5 million over the next two years although a majority of that will be paid by the Los Angeles Dodgers. Andrecheck writes:
Everyone loves a .300-hitting speedster who is one of the biggest basestealing threats in the game. At least that's what the Dodgers were thinking when they signed Pierre. Unfortunately, that .300-hitting speedster can be a pretty bad player if he hits with absolutely no power and rarely takes a walk. Especially when he plays left field, an offensive position. According to OPS+, Pierre has been a league-average hitter or better just twice in his career (last year and in 2004). Considering that defensive metrics have him at just an average defensive left fielder, Pierre certainly isn't worth the money he's owed. Add in the fact that Pierre was unhappy being a fourth outfielder, and Dodgers GM Ned Colletti had to move him.
It is true that Pierre is no power hitter. But that's hardly breaking news. I don't think the Dodgers were expecting him to hit more than 3 home runs a season. Pierre has hit 13 home runs in 10 big league seasons. It is also true that Pierre rarely draws a walk. But it is also true that Pierre rarely strikes out. While Pierre has only walked 340 times in his big league career he has also only struck out 337 times against MLB pitching. Between 2001 and 2007, Pierre was the toughest batter to strike out in the NL in five of those seasons. Put simply Pierre puts the ball in play.
Of course, Pierre is unhappy being a fourth outfielder. Curiously, Andrecheck makes no mention of the arrival of Manny Ramirez who severely curtailed Pierre's playing time. Pierre played in all 162 games between 2003 and 2007 and would have continued to do so if not Ramirez' arrival in July 2008. Given the injuries speedy outfielders are prone to in their knees, hamstrings, quads and Achilles' tendons it's amazing that Pierre is so durable. Aside from a stint on the DL in 2008, Pierre has been remarkably reliable for the teams with which he's played.
O.K., Pierre only walks 35-40 times a year. So what? He has collected 200 or more hits four times. In 2004 and 2006, it was good enough to lead the NL. Between 2001 and 2007, Pierre either led in the NL in stolen bases or came in second. Even with his limited playing time in 2008 and 2009, Pierre still finished 5th in the NL in steals. Yes, he does get caught stealing a lot but he's no rally killer. It's the price one sometimes pays for aggressive baserunning.
As for 2010, put Pierre down for 162 games, 185 hits, 90 runs scored, 50 stolen bases and a .300 average. If he can put up those numbers look for the White Sox to make the post-season in 2010. Of course, Pierre won't be the only player responsible for that but he would set the table big enough to fit several cases of champagne.
I think Andrecheck is one of those baseball writers who places way too much emphasis on OBP, OPS and OPS +. Those stats aren't without merit but they don't tell the whole story. Far from it.
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Xinhua Describes Obama as "Awkward"
I came across this article about former British Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott defending China's actions during the Copenhagen summit.
The article makes passing reference to an article from Xinhua, China's official news agency. In that article, President Obama is described as "awkward." To be precise, the article describes Obama's interaction with Premier Wen during the final day of the Copenhagen Summit:
At 18:50, when leaders of the BASIC countries were doing the final review of their common position, they heard a clamor of voices outside. The door was opened and there stood President Obama. Although the scheduled time for the second China-US meeting had passed, Obama's presence at that moment and that place still came as a surprise to the people inside.
It looks even worse through the Chinese prism. It is not for our President to ask the Premier of China if it is his preference that he wait outside. That's the sort of question you ask of your boss if he or she is on the phone or otherwise occupied. Even if we are borrowing money from China we are still a sovereign nation. President Obama's approach towards China is awkward indeed.
Now one can dismiss Xinhua's account as mere Chinese propaganda. On the other hand if most of the American media look upon President Obama in awe the same cannot be said of the Chinese media which is little more than an extension of the Chinese Communist Party and in turn the Chinese government.
President Obama might have come to office to improve America's standing in the world. Instead, Obama has conveyed an unwillingness to stand up for America.
The article makes passing reference to an article from Xinhua, China's official news agency. In that article, President Obama is described as "awkward." To be precise, the article describes Obama's interaction with Premier Wen during the final day of the Copenhagen Summit:
At 18:50, when leaders of the BASIC countries were doing the final review of their common position, they heard a clamor of voices outside. The door was opened and there stood President Obama. Although the scheduled time for the second China-US meeting had passed, Obama's presence at that moment and that place still came as a surprise to the people inside.
President Obama must, too, have felt a bit awkward. With one foot inside the door, he smiled and asked, "Premier Wen, am I early? Which do you prefer, me waiting outside or joining you?" Premier Wen stood up and welcomed him courteously. President Obama was apparently touched. He first walked around the room, shaking hands with everyone inside, and then sat down on President Lula's left and across the table facing Premier Wen.
It's a slightly different account from what was described in our media - at least the outlet that cared to report it. According to The Hill, President Obama asked, "Mr. Premier, are you ready to see me? Are you ready?"
As I stated in my most recent article:
When President Obama has to ask Premier Wen if he is ready to see him it tells you who is running the show. What if Wen had told Obama to take a hike? For all intents and purposes, Obama bowed to China – again.It looks even worse through the Chinese prism. It is not for our President to ask the Premier of China if it is his preference that he wait outside. That's the sort of question you ask of your boss if he or she is on the phone or otherwise occupied. Even if we are borrowing money from China we are still a sovereign nation. President Obama's approach towards China is awkward indeed.
Now one can dismiss Xinhua's account as mere Chinese propaganda. On the other hand if most of the American media look upon President Obama in awe the same cannot be said of the Chinese media which is little more than an extension of the Chinese Communist Party and in turn the Chinese government.
President Obama might have come to office to improve America's standing in the world. Instead, Obama has conveyed an unwillingness to stand up for America.
Iranian Regime Opens Fire on Crowd During Ashura
The Iranian regime opened fire today on crowds attending Ashura, a holy day of mourning in Shi'a Islam.
At least four people were killed including Seyed Ali Mousavi, the nephew of Mir Hossein Mousavi. It is believed that Mousavi actually won last June's "election." Today's violence was the deadliest in Iran since the aftermath of that "election." At least four deaths have been confirmed but it is believed far more people have lost their lives.
The significance of the Iranian regime attacking its own people on Ashura cannot be underestimated. Farnaz Fassihi of The Wall Street Journal writes:
The weekend's deaths could become particularly heavy with symbolism in Iran, given that Islam bans fighting and killing during this season. During its eight-year war with Iraq, Iran routinely halted its military attacks during this time. Similarly, during Iran's 1970s Islamic revolution, protesters picked Ashura as the signature day to come out en masse against the Shah, assuming correctly that he wouldn't attack on that day.
As a result, many Iranians were shocked at the reports that Iran's security forces beat protesters and opened fire into this weekend's crowds. Analysts said that if public outrage over the violence aligns the so-far dormant religious class against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the crackdown could prove to be a milestone.
It would be an even bigger milestone if President Obama lent a word of support to the people of Iran. But so far he has not commented on the violence. Perhaps he doesn't want anyone meddling with his vacation in Hawaii.
At least four people were killed including Seyed Ali Mousavi, the nephew of Mir Hossein Mousavi. It is believed that Mousavi actually won last June's "election." Today's violence was the deadliest in Iran since the aftermath of that "election." At least four deaths have been confirmed but it is believed far more people have lost their lives.
The significance of the Iranian regime attacking its own people on Ashura cannot be underestimated. Farnaz Fassihi of The Wall Street Journal writes:
The weekend's deaths could become particularly heavy with symbolism in Iran, given that Islam bans fighting and killing during this season. During its eight-year war with Iraq, Iran routinely halted its military attacks during this time. Similarly, during Iran's 1970s Islamic revolution, protesters picked Ashura as the signature day to come out en masse against the Shah, assuming correctly that he wouldn't attack on that day.
As a result, many Iranians were shocked at the reports that Iran's security forces beat protesters and opened fire into this weekend's crowds. Analysts said that if public outrage over the violence aligns the so-far dormant religious class against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the crackdown could prove to be a milestone.
It would be an even bigger milestone if President Obama lent a word of support to the people of Iran. But so far he has not commented on the violence. Perhaps he doesn't want anyone meddling with his vacation in Hawaii.
Jets Beat Colts
It's not often I'm happy for a New York sports team. But congratulations to the New York Jets who handed the Indianapolis Colts their first defeat in the 2009 NFL season. The Jets beat the Colts 29-15. Curiously, Colts QB Peyton Manning and most of the other starters were pulled during the 3rd quarter with a 15-10 lead.
If the Colts had gone undefeated and went on the win Super Bowl then Colts fans would never let New England Patriots fans hear the end of it. Two years ago, the Pats went 16-0 only to be upended by the New York Giants (led by Peyton's younger brother, Eli) in Super Bowl XLII. The 1972 Miami Dolphins are the only team to be undefeated in the regular season and then go on to win the Super Bowl.
If the Colts had gone undefeated and went on the win Super Bowl then Colts fans would never let New England Patriots fans hear the end of it. Two years ago, the Pats went 16-0 only to be upended by the New York Giants (led by Peyton's younger brother, Eli) in Super Bowl XLII. The 1972 Miami Dolphins are the only team to be undefeated in the regular season and then go on to win the Super Bowl.
Gilbert Arenas, Guns & Liberal Media Condescension
A few days ago, a crate of unloaded firearms were found inside the locker of Washington Wizards forward Gilbert Arenas. The firearms were inside a locked container.
The incident is now being investigated both by the Wizards and the NBA. There's also no word if Arenas will be charged with an offense by the District of Columbia.
Jarrett Carter, a liberal sports blogger, then writes an article titled, "Why Gilbert Arenas Should Never Own Guns."
Carter fears for the safety of Arenas' children citing some unspecified "world's demons." Yet it was the arrival of Arenas' new daughter that prompted him to remove the firearms from his home. Now there might very well be legitimate criticism of Arenas for bringing firearms to The Verizon Center. Yet it is worth noting that Carter makes no mention of the fact the guns weren't loaded and were inside a locked container. These are not insignificant details. It is the sign of a responsible gun owner. One wonders what else he might be leaving out.
But why include all the facts when you can make statements such as:
Again, it’s not a discussion about rights as it is who is a right fit for a gun. No one wants those who don’t value their intended purpose to have them, but for Bible-thumpers and thugs alike, the law trumps the common sense of the common man when it comes to weaponry for the citizenry.
Ah yes, those Bible-thumpers who wantonly shoot pistols and rifles for no reason. In Carter's world, those who adhere to the Bible are no better than thugs. But that's liberal tolerance for you.
The incident is now being investigated both by the Wizards and the NBA. There's also no word if Arenas will be charged with an offense by the District of Columbia.
Jarrett Carter, a liberal sports blogger, then writes an article titled, "Why Gilbert Arenas Should Never Own Guns."
Carter fears for the safety of Arenas' children citing some unspecified "world's demons." Yet it was the arrival of Arenas' new daughter that prompted him to remove the firearms from his home. Now there might very well be legitimate criticism of Arenas for bringing firearms to The Verizon Center. Yet it is worth noting that Carter makes no mention of the fact the guns weren't loaded and were inside a locked container. These are not insignificant details. It is the sign of a responsible gun owner. One wonders what else he might be leaving out.
But why include all the facts when you can make statements such as:
Again, it’s not a discussion about rights as it is who is a right fit for a gun. No one wants those who don’t value their intended purpose to have them, but for Bible-thumpers and thugs alike, the law trumps the common sense of the common man when it comes to weaponry for the citizenry.
Ah yes, those Bible-thumpers who wantonly shoot pistols and rifles for no reason. In Carter's world, those who adhere to the Bible are no better than thugs. But that's liberal tolerance for you.
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Thoughts on The Assault of Pope Benedict XVI
Despite the fact that no harm came to Pope Benedict XVI during Christmas Mass, the attack on him is nonetheless disconcerting.
It is disconcerting because the attack happened only days after Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi was assaulted and injured seriously enough to require hospitalization.
It is also disconcerting because the woman who attacked the Pope was known to authorities and apparently tried to pull off an attack last year. If a young woman with a history of mental illness can breach Vatican security then imagine what an Islamic fundamentalist who knows how to set off an explosive could do.
The Pontiff has angered Muslims in the past and it wouldn't take very much for him to anger them again. If Islamic fundamentalists are prepared to launch an attack on the Pope at the Vatican (or abroad) I cannot say with any confidence if their level of readiness would be sufficient to prevent an act of terrorism.
It is disconcerting because the attack happened only days after Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi was assaulted and injured seriously enough to require hospitalization.
It is also disconcerting because the woman who attacked the Pope was known to authorities and apparently tried to pull off an attack last year. If a young woman with a history of mental illness can breach Vatican security then imagine what an Islamic fundamentalist who knows how to set off an explosive could do.
The Pontiff has angered Muslims in the past and it wouldn't take very much for him to anger them again. If Islamic fundamentalists are prepared to launch an attack on the Pope at the Vatican (or abroad) I cannot say with any confidence if their level of readiness would be sufficient to prevent an act of terrorism.
Mets Land Kelvim Escobar
New York Mets fans might wonder if they got a lump of coal in their Christmas stockings but just haven't bothered to check yet.
Free agent pitcher Kelvim Escobar has signed a one-year, $1.25 million contract with the Mets pending a physical. Usually a physical is a formality but Escobar has pitched a grand total of one game over the past two seasons with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. Escobar's last full season in the majors was in 2007 when he won a career high 18 games with the Angels.
The Mets plan to use Escobar in the bullpen possibly as the set up man for Francisco "K-Rod" Rodriguez. Now it's entirely possible that Escobar could be healthy and might be a good addition to the Mets bullpen. The problem is that in this off season the Mets have at various times pursued Roy Halladay, John Lackey, Kevin Millwood and Jason Bay. These efforts have borne no fruit. It's possible the Mets could still sign Bay but it appears the door is opening up for him to re-sign with the Red Sox. It might be that Bay realizes the Mets aren't going anywhere and why not stay with a team that has made the postseason five out of the last six years.
The Mets need an additional starting pitcher and power hitting outfielder and have nothing to show for their efforts. If your only free agent signing hasn't pitched in nearly two years it isn't exactly cause for celebration amongst Mets fans.
On the other hand it might be that the Mets are hoping Carlos Beltran, Jose Reyes and Carlos Delgado will be healthy and David Wright will see better pitches to hit. While the Mets floundered without them in 2009 they couldn't get to the post season with them in 2007 or 2008.
I'm not knocking the Mets for taking a chance on Escobar. But if that is their only move then it doesn't inspire confidence. The New York Mets are very much at a crossroads in 2010.
Free agent pitcher Kelvim Escobar has signed a one-year, $1.25 million contract with the Mets pending a physical. Usually a physical is a formality but Escobar has pitched a grand total of one game over the past two seasons with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. Escobar's last full season in the majors was in 2007 when he won a career high 18 games with the Angels.
The Mets plan to use Escobar in the bullpen possibly as the set up man for Francisco "K-Rod" Rodriguez. Now it's entirely possible that Escobar could be healthy and might be a good addition to the Mets bullpen. The problem is that in this off season the Mets have at various times pursued Roy Halladay, John Lackey, Kevin Millwood and Jason Bay. These efforts have borne no fruit. It's possible the Mets could still sign Bay but it appears the door is opening up for him to re-sign with the Red Sox. It might be that Bay realizes the Mets aren't going anywhere and why not stay with a team that has made the postseason five out of the last six years.
The Mets need an additional starting pitcher and power hitting outfielder and have nothing to show for their efforts. If your only free agent signing hasn't pitched in nearly two years it isn't exactly cause for celebration amongst Mets fans.
On the other hand it might be that the Mets are hoping Carlos Beltran, Jose Reyes and Carlos Delgado will be healthy and David Wright will see better pitches to hit. While the Mets floundered without them in 2009 they couldn't get to the post season with them in 2007 or 2008.
I'm not knocking the Mets for taking a chance on Escobar. But if that is their only move then it doesn't inspire confidence. The New York Mets are very much at a crossroads in 2010.
Friday, December 25, 2009
Will Obama Stay Silent About Liu Xiaobo?
Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo was sentenced to 11 years in prison for subversion.
While many world leaders have condemned Xiaobo's sentence as of this writing President Obama has said nothing.
Given his acquiescence towards China during his state visit last month and again last week in Copenhagen I cannot help but wonder if he will once again say that it is not for us to meddle.
If he does the sentiments expressed in his Nobel acceptance speech will amount to nothing more than a series of platitudes.
Thoughts on Northwest Airlines Flight 253
If you don't know by now, a Nigerian national affiliated with al Qaeda tried to blowup Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit. Fortunately, he was subdued by several other passengers and no one was killed.
Although the White House regards this as an attempted terrorist attack it worries me that people won't take this incident as seriously as they should. This will be chalked up as another Richard Reid like incident. Richard Reid is thought of as a buffoon rather than someone intent on mass murder.
On the other hand, you would think that al Qaeda operatives would know by now that if they hijack commercial aircraft then passengers will fight back.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Angels & Nationals Get Some Relief
Both the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim and the Washington Nationals have obtained relief. Not from the federal government but in the form of pitchers.
Yesterday, the Angels signed Fernando Rodney to a two-year contract worth $11 million. Rodney was the closer for the Detroit Tigers in 2009 and saved 37 games. It is interesting that the Angels went out and signed Rodney despite the fact that Brian Fuentes led the AL in saves with 48. Clearly, the Angels are not all that confident in Fuentes especially after he struggled during the post-season.
I suspect that Fuentes will begin 2010 as the Angels closer with Rodney being his set up man. Rodney has been a set up man most of his MLB career. But if Fuentes struggles early then Angels skipper Mike Scioscia will have Rodney close out games. Fuentes has been a set up man in the past.
Before the Colorado Rockies went on their great run in 2007, Fuentes had struggled as their closer. Rockies manager Clint Hurdle named Manny Corpas as the closer while Fuentes became the 8th inning man. It was not long after that decision came to pass that the Rockies turned their fortunes around. Now whether Fuentes would respond in the same manner in an Angels uniform remains to be seen.
Meanwhile, Matt Capps has signed with the Washington Nationals. The terms of the deal are presently unknown. Capps saved a career high 27 games for the Pittsburgh Pirates in 2009. However, the burly right hander also went 4-8 with a 5.80 ERA and the Pirates made Capps walk the plank. At 25, Capps does have youth on his side.
But the Nationals have a Plan B. They have also signed veteran left hander Eddie Guardado. "Everyday Eddie" pitched for the Texas Rangers in 2009. Guardado was a closer with the Twins and Mariners earlier this decade. While the 39-year-old did not save a game in '09, Guardado is an option to close should Capps not fill the bill.
Yesterday, the Angels signed Fernando Rodney to a two-year contract worth $11 million. Rodney was the closer for the Detroit Tigers in 2009 and saved 37 games. It is interesting that the Angels went out and signed Rodney despite the fact that Brian Fuentes led the AL in saves with 48. Clearly, the Angels are not all that confident in Fuentes especially after he struggled during the post-season.
I suspect that Fuentes will begin 2010 as the Angels closer with Rodney being his set up man. Rodney has been a set up man most of his MLB career. But if Fuentes struggles early then Angels skipper Mike Scioscia will have Rodney close out games. Fuentes has been a set up man in the past.
Before the Colorado Rockies went on their great run in 2007, Fuentes had struggled as their closer. Rockies manager Clint Hurdle named Manny Corpas as the closer while Fuentes became the 8th inning man. It was not long after that decision came to pass that the Rockies turned their fortunes around. Now whether Fuentes would respond in the same manner in an Angels uniform remains to be seen.
Meanwhile, Matt Capps has signed with the Washington Nationals. The terms of the deal are presently unknown. Capps saved a career high 27 games for the Pittsburgh Pirates in 2009. However, the burly right hander also went 4-8 with a 5.80 ERA and the Pirates made Capps walk the plank. At 25, Capps does have youth on his side.
But the Nationals have a Plan B. They have also signed veteran left hander Eddie Guardado. "Everyday Eddie" pitched for the Texas Rangers in 2009. Guardado was a closer with the Twins and Mariners earlier this decade. While the 39-year-old did not save a game in '09, Guardado is an option to close should Capps not fill the bill.
Obama on Health Care Bill: "Most Important Piece of Social Legislation Since 1930s."
So I guess that Civil Rights Act wasn't that big of a deal.
Suffice it to say modesty isn't one of President Obama's strong suits.
Suffice it to say modesty isn't one of President Obama's strong suits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
